I’ll begin with an admission; I consider Into the Woods the
best musical of the last quarter of the 20th century. What else is there? Toss out the spectacles,
like Miss Saigon, Phantom of the Opera (which lost the Tony awards for best
book and best score to Woods yet still nabbed the Best Musical Tony) and Les
Miz. Throw away the jukebox musicals,
like Jersey Boys and Contact. Please
omit any musical based on a movie (Sunset Boulevard, The Lion King). Anyone thinking Cats should stop reading this
right now. What’s left? Fluff like A Chorus Line, forgettable shows
like Passion, and idiosyncratic shows like Avenue Q (it has a brilliant score,
but it has to be performed with puppets).
The only other contenders are Stephen Sondheim’s other masterpiece Sweeny
Todd (too macabre) and Evita, which was made into a movie starring Madonna; enough
said.
The musical Into the Woods opened on Broadway in 1988, so its
path to the film version was a long time coming. This was mostly because musicals were
considered death at the box office until Rob Marshall single handedly
resurrected the genre with Chicago.
Still, even with Marshall attached to Into the Woods the Disney folks
would only finance a stripped down version for a measly $50 million
budget. I wonder if part of their
thinking was to keep someone from making a really subversive version of
a story involving Cinderella.
The budget constraints don’t show as the film looks
mah-vel-ous. Special effects like a
giant beanstalk are now done cheaply on computer, and they wisely declined to
actually show Cinderella at the ball, so they saved money there. The cast is mostly . . . well, not B list,
but B+ list, except for Meryl Streep.
Streep has now crossed what I call the Lawrence Olivier Threshold, which
means she has reached a point where she can chew the scenery for days and
because of her years of superb work, she will be forgiven.
The book brilliantly interweaves a number of the stories
from the Grimm fairy tales: Cinderella (with golden shoes, not glass), Jack and
the beanstalk, Little Red Riding Hood, and Rapunzel. These stories are notably grim, in every
sense of the word—several characters are blinded by birds (or thorns), a number
are killed (although this being a Disney production, a couple of murders in the
original text are converted to accidents), and two characters are eaten,
although they get better.
The book touches on a number of Big Themes; being careful
what you wish for, proper parenting techniques (hint: abandoning your daughter
to a swamp after blinding her boyfriend is not being a good mother), and
the need for community. Supplementing the dialog are the songs (or is the
dialog supplementing the songs?) all of which feature Sondheim’s signature wit
and intricacy.
The book manages to turn the fairy tale characters into real
flesh and blood human beings. Cinderella
is an abused step-daughter living in a nightmare; Jack is a dim-witted boy whose
best friend is a cow; Little Red Riding Hood is a self-assured young girl
easily distracted by forbidden fruit; and a baker and his wife (the only new
characters to the story) desperately want a child. Each wants something, but when they get what
they want the result is no happy ever after.
The cast, mostly non-theatrical actors, further ground the material
in real emotion while playing against the fanciful background. Anna Kendrick brings a sadness to Cinderella,
appropriate for a woman treated as a servant by a wicked step-mother and two
wicked step-sisters. James Corden and Emily
Blunt as the baker and his wife, have a nice chemistry as a married couple more
familiar with the other than themselves.
Chris Pine brings a Captain Kirk bravado to Prince Charming.
The literalness of film creates some problem with the more
theatrical elements of the play. The
script omits the character of The Narrator, which is taken up by voice overs by
the baker. The death of Jack’s cow on
stage is funny, but the sight of a real cow keeling over is not so
amusing. And the film’s rendering of the
giant attacking the village, obviously done off-stage in the theater, comes
across less convincingly on screen. I
also had a problem with casting a pre-teen boy as Jack, as he came across as
inconsequential in some of his more emotional scenes.
On the other hand, the film lends some nice touches that
would be impossible on stage. Cinderella’s
song as she’s leaving the prince’s ball (On the Steps of the Palace) is nicely
done as almost an internal monologue, with time frozen around her as she contemplates
her options. And of course the princes
look much more dashing on horses.
It looks like the movie version of Into the Woods will
nearly earn back its production budget over its opening weekend, which is good
news for fans of converting Broadway musicals to the screen. It used to be that Broadway was the source
material for dozens of movies per year; now each year movies are re-imagined as
Broadway shows (I can hardly wait for Back to the Future: The Musical). [I’m not sure, but I think the last Top 40
hit to come from a Broadway show was One Night in Bangkok from Chess] The economics of Broadway means it will never
again be the source of innovation and imagination it used to be, but it is nice
to know that Hollywood can still turn a Broadway musical into a big-screen
hit. It just takes 26 years.
No comments:
Post a Comment