Wednesday, November 29, 2017

TV Review: Crisis on Earth X

TV Review: Crisis on Earth X

There is no more understandable or predictable sin than going back to the well once too often.  If something succeeds, then you do it again, only bigger.  And if THAT succeeds, then wash, rinse, repeat.  If the first Star Wars trilogy was innovative, then another one will be better; if the second trilogy makes a lot of money, then do some more until the people stop buying tickets.

 It’s amazing when someone dodges this bullet and does a sequel or follow up that is better than the original.  The third Mad Max film, Beyond Thunderdome, was better than the second one, which itself was better than the low-budget original (and most critics think the fourth installment, Fury Road, was the best of them all).  But it is hard to come up with other examples where someone tried to do “the same, but better” and actually succeeded.

As of this week there is another example—CW’s second “crossover event,” Crisis on Earth X, is head and shoulders above last year’s Heroes vs. Aliens event.  It’s almost like they learned what mistakes to avoid last year, and then . . . avoided them.  It is a great four hours of television that is greater than the sum of its parts, which are estimable.

There were a couple of obvious problems with Heroes vs. Aliens.  First, the threat was some new species of alien called Dominators that had not been introduced into the CWverse beforehand, meaning that the stakes were not immediately understood as cataclysmic.  Second, the episode of Supergirl dedicated to the event was completely irrelevant, until the crossover aspect was introduced in the last two minutes.  Third, the plan the good guys had seemed sort of lame; if I remember correctly, The Flash wanted Supergirl to do mock attacks, so they could test battle strategies on her because she, like the Dominators, was an alien.

The biggest problem was that each show—Supergirl, The Flash, Arrow, and Legends of Tomorrow—held true to their own casts and production style, which made the overall arc inconsistent and difficult to follow for those who didn’t watch all of them (I follow three of them but gave up on Arrow very quickly).  The plot jerked all over the place as each show tended to their own story arcs and characters and only provisionally attended to the quality of the event.

That is NOT the case with Crisis on Earth X.  It is essentially a 4-part mini-series, with every scene directed to serving the overarching plot and not the characters of whatever series bears the title of the episode.  The episode of Supergirl that started it off was about Barry Allen and Iris West’s wedding; Supergirl (and her sister Alex) were attending, but the opening scene is all about The Flash.  Some of the Legends don’t show up until the Legends’ episode, but the cast is so full that frankly it’s a relief.  The character of Win Schott is not in the Supergirl segment, but does an impressive bit during The Flash episode.

There was truly a lot of “crossover” interaction among the cast, most notably Alex Danvers getting drunk at the rehearsal dinner and hooking up with Legends’ Sara Lance.  The friendship between Barry Allen and Kara Danvers aka Supergirl had already been established, but Grant Gustin and Melissa Benoit have a wonderful chemistry.  Likewise, Barry’s friendship with Oliver Queen had been establish, but their scenes are true interactions and not just Steven Amell “guest starring” on The Flash (well, technically they were on Supergirl, but as I said, it is best to forget the individual show titles and just think of the shows as episodes 1-4 of a mini-series). 

The choice of antagonist was well-considered, as Nazis from another planet are new to the CWverse (I think I should refer to it as the “Arrowverse” but like I said, I don’t watch Arrow) yet familiar.  Any fan of sci-fi (which I am assuming takes up most of the audience for these shows) would have no trouble believing in an alternate universe where Nazis rule Earth, and Nazis as an enemy is a known quantity (just ask Indiana Jones).  It also works as a meta-concept, given that a certain highly placed public figure has said that he thinks Nazis are nice people too, so they can attack Nazis but can claim not to be making any political statement even when the sub-text has become text.

You can quibble with some of the plotting, but on a tale of this magnitude some slack is deserved.  Gaining access to the Nazi facility by having this universe’s Arrow impersonate Earth-X’s Arrow, when they know there is a doppelganger, is just lazy writing.  The sheer number of superheroes demanded crowd control at some point, and the Nazi guards were as accurate with machine guns as Imperial Stormtroopers are with blasters (that is to say, they can’t hit the side of a barn if they were inside the barn).

But the result was a four-hour mini-series that was easily the equal of the Netflix series Jessica Jones or Daredevil season one.  It is also nice to have a science fiction show that has epic CGI battles, but also takes time to develop characters and invests in emotional payoffs (spoiler: someone dies).  The series featured not one but two same sex couples kissing, and definitively staked out a position that Nazis are not good at a time when that message, sadly, needs to be refreshed with a lot of people.

Crisis on Earth X is a sprawling, epic, masterful use of the mini-series format to tell a story that no individual series could tell episodically. The writing, acting and directing were all of the highest order, which is impressive given the logistics of having to produce the mini-series while the four series were simultaneously in production (Supergirl did the most obvious cheat by featuring an episode that was entirely a flashback with teen actors standing in for the regulars).  Crisis on Earth X is as much a sign that we live in the Platinum Age of Television as The Sopranos, Breaking Bad or Mad Men; just a lot more fun.



Sunday, November 19, 2017

Marvel vs. DC, movies vs. television

The weekend grosses for DC’s major release Justice League are in, and the results are not good for DC.  Justice League may be the worst DC opening ever, and the first to open below $100 million domestically.  This follows on the heels of the successful opening of the latest Thor movie, Ragnarok.  The primary explanation for Justice League’s failing is that despite some major script doctoring and reshooting by Joss Whedon, Justice League still share the DNA of such dour fare as Superman vs. Batman and Man of Steel, neither of which were laugh fests like Whedon’s The Avengers or its far less superior sequel.

Of course, the whole “Marvel vs. DC” thing goes way back and is bigger than one film.  What I find interesting is that the images of the two comic universes are completely reversed if you switch from the TV universe and the movie franchises.

On TV, DC has The Flash, which was great in its early days precisely because it was a breath of fresh air after the gloomy Batman trilogy and all its angst and gloom.  The series stumbled last season by getting a little too dark, but seems committed to going back to more light-hearted fare this season.  Arrow, despite being pretty angsty, has consistently embraced its inner silliness.  Legends of Tomorrow started off as deadly earnest and was a bore its first season; then the show decided to just go with the silly and has been a rejuvenated show ever since.

Marvel’s TV image is far more glum.  Agents of Shield started out light and breezy, but once it started taking its plot points from the movies (see below) a lot of the humor went away.  Marvel’s newer offering, The Gifted, is nothing but perpetual angst as the forces of the US Government torment and harass mutants on a weekly basis, with the government agents all but cackling with glee. I tried to watch The Gifted mostly out of loyalty to Amy Acker, but I gave up after six episodes.  Another recent Marvel offering, Inhumans, was described by the LA Times as, “tr[ying] for a joke now and again, but it is overall somnolent and solemn.”  I haven’t been watching Inhumans as the first episode was described in one review as the worst thing Marvel ever produced, and other reviews have produced a Metascore of 27.

In movies, the opposite is the case.  DC has been slammed for bleak products like the aforementioned Zack Snyder offerings, while Marvel went with the master of mixing superpowers and humor, Joss Whedon, and reaped the biggest superhero film ever, The Avengers.  The Marvel X-Men franchise started out light and quippy as well, and the franchise tried to sell the heavier ideas it possessed with a spoonful of humor.

I don’t know why both studios should be so schizophrenic about the tone of their products.  There has been some blurring recently; as I said, once Agents of Shield started to incorporate plot points from Winter Soldier it started getting less fun, and DC has tried to lighten the image of its films by bringing Joss Whedon on board for rewrites and reshoots (I would love to bet that every punch line in the Justice League trailer was written by Whedon; each one sounds like something that was an outtake on Buffy).

The Christopher Nolan Batman trilogy demonstrated that comic books (excuse me, “graphic novels”) could be taken seriously; maybe a little too seriously.  I can’t tell you how refreshing it was to watch the first few episodes of The Flash and see a superhero who was happy and liked using his powers to help people.  But things change, and now it seems that audiences want a lighter touch when viewing the activities of their favorite metahuman, or X-man, or whatever.

The fact that Thor: Ragnarok has succeeded as a comedy is the best proof of this.  The first two Thor films were the least amusing of the Marvel entries, and the second one, The Dark World, was, well, dark (the one great moment in that film was a supposedly ad libbed moment by Chris Hemsworth when Thor entered Jane’s apartment and politely hung his hammer on an umbrella hook near the door). Ragnarok’s success, combined with Justice League’s unimpressive first weekend opening under $100 million, would seem to show the writing is on the wall.


It’s a narrow path to tread; be light and carefree, but don’t fail to take your material seriously.  Joss Whedon did this better than anyone for Buffy the Vampire Slayer, and the fact that he couldn’t quite rescue Justice League indicates to me that it must have been pretty far gone.  Both studios could learn from each other, with Marvel’s TV programs taking a cue from Legends of Tomorrow and the DC movie producers finding writers capable of finding the funny.

Sunday, November 12, 2017

In the NFL, the inmates ARE running the asylum


So it’s come to this: I defend Roger Goodell.

A few weeks ago, Houston Texan’s owner Robert McNair made headlines when it was revealed that he said that the NFL should be tougher in dealing with protesters because they couldn’t have “inmates running the prison.”  There was some initial debate if he misspoke and meant to say “inmates running the asylum” because supposedly comparing NFL players to insane people was less insulting than comparing them to convicted criminals. 

I don’t think it really makes a difference, either sentiment displays the attitude of many owners that the team owners don’t just own the teams, they own the players just like slaveholders in the Old South owned their slaves.  The players and the owners are supposed to be partners, but some of the rich White men who own the teams have a contemptuous opinion of their supposed “partners.”

Then last week Dallas Cowboy’s owner Jerry Jones threatened to individually sue any fellow owner who approved a contract extension for Roger Goodell, an obvious response to Goodell finally being allowed to impose a 6-game suspension of Cowboy’s star (pun not intended) running back Ezekiel Elliot.  Jones has been dismissive of the entre process, opining that the penalty was an excessive response to the allegations that Elliot merely physically assaulted his girlfriend.  I guess Jones’ opinion is that if a man can’t smack his girlfriend around, what is this country coming to?

Jones is now saying the NFL penalty mechanism is so unfair he will sue if it is enforced against his team.  Of course, he said nothing against the decision to suspend Patriot’s quarterback Tom Brady for four games, so his outrage is selective.

If the other owners are smart they will ignore his threats a go ahead and give Goodell the extension he probably doesn’t deserve.  Al Davis occasionally challenged the NFL, but that was about marketing his team, not on-the-field advantage.  If the owners cave, then Goodell will be loath to impose any future penalties on a Cowboys player, lest he face the wrath of Jerry Jones.

Of course, the other owners could take this as an opportunity to strip the Commissioner’s office of all authority to impose suspensions, but given the public outrage over many of Goodell’s decisions to impose mild penalties for perceived faults (most notably the Ray Rice case, lest Jerry Jones think that no one cares about domestic violence cases) I think the owners would recognize that having some sort of figurehead is a good idea.  Especially since Goodell has proven effective as being a punching bag for public outrage.

Can Jones make good on his threat to sue the other owners?  Sure, in America anyone can sue anybody for anything.  The deal to extend Goodell’s contract was approved unanimously, meaning Jones supported it.  And Jones agreed to participate in the NFL and abide by its rules, including the method of determining Goodell’s salary, so it is a little late in the game for him to decide the rules aren’t fair.  And as noted above, he never had any problem with the NFL’s suspension process until his star player was suspended. Given that he agreed to everything, and has never said anything about how the process has worked in the past, it is hard to see how a lawyer could make a case that Jones’ suit is anything but a self-serving attempt to give his team an on-field advantage by being allowed to play players despite their breaking NFL rules.

I think Goodell has been largely incompetent in the penalty aspect of his job, botching the Ray Rice investigation, the deflate-gate situation (Brady was guilty, but even I think a four-game suspension was too harsh), and also not responding quickly enough to concussion concerns, the anthem situation, and the blackballing of Colin Kaepernick.  The contrary argument is that he’s made a lot of money for the owners (including Jerry Jones), but I am in the camp that believes a trained bonobo as Commissioner could have overseen the economic boom of the NFL.  The American appetite for violence is insatiable, and the NFL is the country’s primary distributor.

By the way, this is why I dismiss any claim that people aren’t watching NFL games because of anthem protests.  The anthem is usually not telecast, and besides, where are these people going to get their weekly dose of violence?  Watch soccer?  NASCAR?  If people aren’t watching the NFL it is because overextension has diluted the product, and because major athletes are getting injured at an increasing level because safety concerns have been ignored for years.


Looking at the disarray among the NFL owners over Roger Goodell’s contract extension, one can only conclude that Robert McNair was correct; the inmates are running the asylum.

Wednesday, November 1, 2017

The first 2017 cancellation has occurred!

One of the evolving aspects of the new media culture is the reluctance of television networks to decisively “cancel” TV shows.  There used to be an annual deathwatch to identify the first series to be axed, with speculation based on quality, time slot, and the star power associated with the show.  But in recent years, the wait for the first cancellation of the TV season has been attenuated by networks refusing to make a firm irrevocable decision about the fate of all of its series in favor of the more flexible option of simply not ordering more episodes of a show and letting the series die a peaceful death.

The 2017 TV season has apparently claimed its first fatality, as CBS has pulled the plug on Me, Myself, & I, its high concept comedy about a man facing issues at three different stages of his life.  The show wasn’t “cancelled,” but its time slot will be given to another show; the fact that the other show is the critically reviled “Man With a Plan” (Metacritic rating 36; named one of the 10 worst shows of 2016) indicates that the network has lost faith in a show.  Of course, they say the show will return, but if so it is likely to have its episodes burned off during the wasteland of January.

What I find a little odd about this is that Me, Myself & I didn’t look like a candidate for the first cancellation of the year.  The show had an unspectacular but decent Metacritic score of 57, with a respectable User Score of 6.3.  The show starred Bobby Moynihan, a popular alumnus of Saturday Night Live, and John Larroquette, a TV acting legend who won four consecutive Emmies as a Supporting Actor in a Comedy for Night Court.  The first casualty is usually a low brow comedy critics hated (2008’s Do Not Disturb, Metacritic score of 21), or possibly a high concept drama with expensive production values (The Playboy Club, 2011).  This season, for example, ABC’s Ten Days in the Valley hasn’t been cancelled, but being moved to Saturdays is not a sign of support by the network.

I watched the first three episodes of Me, Myself and I, and I enjoyed it while being aware of its limitations.  While the show could have the pilot episode, and first few regular episodes, deal with plots that would engage the main character as a youth, a middle-aged man, and a retiree, I couldn’t see how the show could develop its characters moving forward.  I also felt the show did a bad job of handling the main character’s occupation as an inventor, which seemed to revolve around him coming up with “wacky” props that all seemed silly.

I did stop watching the show, but only because my DVR only permits me to watch one show and record another, and once Supergirl and Lucifer were going head to head during the same time slot, I had no choice.  I could have watched the show on demand, but quite frankly I didn’t care. 

In looking over the list of each season's first show to be cancelled, one stands out.  In 2002 ABC ran a show created by Ben Affleck called Push, Nevada.  The show was reminiscent of Twin Peaks, but with a gimmick; every week there would be a clue, and once all the clues were revealed the first person to figure out the puzzle would win a cash prize.  The show was critically well received, with a Metacritic score of 70, way higher than any other first-to-be-cancelled show since 2000.  I enjoyed it, but for whatever reason ABC pulled the plug after 7 episodes.  However, under federal rules they had to complete the contest, so the actor who played the lead character appeared during a break on Monday Night Football and dumped the rest of the clues all at once.  I liked it.

For reasons that escape my understanding, Me, Myself, and I’s partner in the early Monday time slot for CBS, the incredibly lame-looking 9JKL (Metacritic score 36, User Score of 1.8), has not been relegated to a January burn-off.  In fact, it will take over Me, Myself, and I’s time slot while Man With a Plan will take over its slot.  Me, Myself & I had an initial rating of 1.6 which fell to 0.7 (among viewers between 18-49).  Last week the Monday lineup lost Big Bang Theory as a lead-in as it moved back to Thursdays, which caused the following CBS line-0up to fall in viewership.  9JKL had a rating of 0.8 on October 30, the same week Me, Myself, & I was 0.7, so I guess that extra 0.1 was enough to keep it on the air.

While I wasn’t a fan of Me, Myself, & I, I am sad it was the first casualty of the 2017 TV season.  Larroquette was a joy as always, and the premise was not the usual cookie-cutter product most TV series are (for example, 9JKL is about a son moving in next door to his parents; wasn’t that Everybody Loves Raymond’s plot?).  Buck up, all you unemployed actors; the new TV pilot season is only a few months away!