One
of the things I find frustrating about baseball in the modern era (I am not
sure what I mean by that; post-steroid, pre-robot umpire?) is the unmooring of
a concept that I understood intuitively even before I took a single course in
statistics—that over a 162 game season, crap evens out. A bad bounce on a
ground ball, an unfortunate gust of wind propelling a fly ball into the stands,
an ump having a bad day behind the plate, could all influence the outcome of a
single game, but over the course of a season the breaks will even out and the
better team will win more games.
One aspect of this unmooring is the replay rule, which demands
that EVERY play be examined in super-slo-mo to assure that the ball was caught
by the first baseman a full one-thousandths of a second before the batter’s
foot hit first base. Yes, egregious calls need to be corrected, if
possible (assuming there can be a consensus on the definition of “egregious”)
but unlike football, a missed play here or there won’t necessarily determine
whether a team’s season is considered a success or a failure.
There are policy reasons for imprecision. The
“neighborhood” play at second was conceded for decades, because not caring that
the pivot man in a double play touched second base while he had the ball was
more important that fielders’ risking knee damage from a hard slide, or runners
being beaned by thrown balls that travel exactly down the baseline to first
base instead of from an angle outside the basepath. But now if a
shortstop is a fraction of an inch off the base when making the pivot, the
other team will challenge the call and demand that someone ion New York City
review it.
More recently, I have become annoyed with well-meaning
commentators grousing about the one-game playoff between wild card teams in
each league. For example, on this FiveThirtyEight podcast the
moderator says a one-game play-in game wasn’t fair and they should play a seven
game series.
The World Series already threatens to extend into the first days
of November; a seven game wild card series would guarantee a World Series
starting in November and ending after the Ides of November. That sounds
iffy for a sport where, unlike the Super Bowl, the location of the finals can’t
be determined in advance; given that the Twins play in an outdoor stadium IN
MINNESOTA this seems insane.
The thing is this—the purpose of the wild card play-in game is
NOT to decide which team is the better one. They just finished playing
162 games and the team hosting the play-in game had some advantage over the
other one that justified giving them home field advantage. Playing one
game is unlikely to better make this determination. The A’s had a
one-game lead over the Rays after 162 games, so they host; even if they lose
the play-in game, they would have the same record but the A’s won the season
series over the Rays, so they still could be considered the better team.
No, the purpose of the wild card play in game is to disadvantage
wild card teams in the next round of the playoffs. Presumably the teams
in the wild card play-in game will start their ace, making him unavailable for
the first two or three games of the Division Series. The wild card winner
will send their #2 starter against the division winner’s #1 starters, and their
#3 starter against the other team’s #2.
When the wild card was implemented it seemed like a good idea
(and it was), until wild card teams started winning the World
Series. In the NFL, wild card teams have the disadvantage of no
home field advantage, but in baseball if you split the first two games suddenly
the home field advantage shifts, and now three of the remaining five games are
played at the wild card team’s park. Something was needed to subtly give
the division winner a slight edge over a team that merely came in second (or
even possibly third).
So don’t gripe about the Nationals getting lucky because a
rookie outfielder botched a routine ground ball to right field. Maybe the
Brewers could have won a seven-game series, but they should have gotten the
opportunity to play in one by winning their division.
No comments:
Post a Comment