We are about to enter a new era, boys and girls: we
can watch movies on our phones, we can watch Ant Man and The Wasp without
having seen any prior Marvel movie (other than Ant Man) except for the last two
minutes, and The Doctor doesn’t have a penis. Oh what an age we live in.
In case you’ve been living under a rock, you probably know
that the new Doctor Who debuting this Fall will have actress Jodie Whittaker portraying
the venerable Gallifreyan. A lot of people are making a big deal about
this, but I’m sort of meh.
Don’t get me wrong, it clearly is a breakthrough in gender
equality casting. I think the only argument for making The Doctor a man
for the past 55 years is that The Doctor frequently fin ds himself in
situations where he has to take command and bark orders, and until recently a
woman doing that would have had to carry some extra baggage. It’s the age-old
conundrum for women; men are commanding, but women are shrill. However,
we are well past the Margaret Thatcher era, and a woman won the popular
election for President in the United States in 2016. So yay us, we may
now accept a woman as a leader.
The reason I am loath to treat a female Doctor with wild
abandon is that I always considered The Doctor a rather asexual character to
begin with. Given that the show was originally conceived as a children’s
educational program, he’d almost have to be. During the entire run of the
“Classic” Doctor Who series, there was never any discussion, speculation, or
recognition of The Doctor’s love life. He traveled with mini-skirted Jo
Grant with nary a leer. Sarah Jane Smith was nothing more than a good
buddy. Peter Davison’s Doctor traveled with an attractive Australian
stewardess and a teenaged girl without any speculation about hanky-panky.
Colin Baker showed no interest in Peri’s, um, attributes, and Sylvester McCoy
was nothing but avuncular with Ace.
This changed in the revived series, when Rose Tyler, an
attractive London teenager, joined the Doctor and clearly had a thing for older
men (much older, since he was over 900 years old at that point). The
Doctor physically changing into David Tenant only increased the attraction, and
eventually it became mutual (there was also the episode where The Doctor became
trapped in France with Madame Du Pompadour and the first thing she did was
offer to show him her bedroom). The Doctor’s next companion, Martha
Jones, was even more overt in her finding The Doctor to be physically
appealing, but he was rebounding from Rose and never reciprocated (personal
aside: what an idiot!). Amy Pond indicated several times that she thought
the eleventh Doctor was sexy, and at her wedding she enthusiastically told The
Doctor that he could “absolutely, definitely kiss the bride,” but he
demurred.
The only time the Doctor did seem to have some interest in
someone of the opposite sex was when Peter Capaldi’s Doctor spent one night with
River Song, but they’d been previously married and it was on a planet where the
nights lasted twenty-four years, so presumably they found some way to pass the
time.
So, to sum up, over the course of 55 years the Doctor has
travelled with a number of extremely attractive young women, and until recently
there was never any hint that he had much of a libido (to quote the lyric of
the song One Night in Bangkok, “I get my kicks above the waistline,
sunshine”). Since the character was never defined by his masculinity, the
gender switch shouldn’t engender (sorry) much of a change.
The switch is obviously partly motivated by the successful
transition (sorry again) of The Master to Missy. It’s all about the
casting; personally, I thought John Simm made a HORRIBLE Master, so anything
was bound to be an improvement. Michelle Gomez was able to embody
the qualities of the old Master, a sort of restrained but cheerful sociopathy,
that Simm took over the top and then some. Part of what I disliked about
Simm’s portrayal was that his Master had a sexy trophy wife, something no
previous incarnation of The Master ever gave a second thought to. The
Master didn’t care about sex; he just wanted to rule the universe. What’s
sex compared to that?
If new Doctor Who showrunner Chris Chibnall is smart, then
the scripts for the next season of Doctor Who should treat the new Doctor
exactly as the old one was treated. That’s why the show has lasted since the
early 60’s; The Doctor, however different each incarnation is, is essentially
fungible. Their MOs may vary somewhat, their senses of humor get tweaked,
their physical skills range from klutzy to expert at Venusian aikido, but in
the end the Doctor is The Doctor.
Gender doesn’t enter into the Doctor’s persona, nor should
it; unless the show wants to get into the nitty gritty of where little Time
Lords and Ladies come from, and frankly that is TMI.
No comments:
Post a Comment