We are in the middle of a sexual harassment tsunami.
All over the place well-known producers, directors, actors and politicians are
being accused of doing things that range from creepy to, well, really creepy,
either to members of the opposite sex or, in some cases, members of the same
sex.
It is easy to believe these allegations when they are made
against someone who looks like every wanted poster for a child molester ever
made (Harvey Weinstein), or there is confirmatory evidence (Matt Lauer and his
door that secretly locked), or are confirmed by photographic evidence (Al
Franken). With all these women coming forward under #metoo, what is next?
The next phase is inevitable: women with an axe to grind
will start making false accusation against innocent people and hope to ride the
coattails of outrage that accompany these revelations. With all these
seemingly credible accusations being made, it is easy to lose sight of the fact
that we do live in a nation where the cornerstone of our legal system is
innocent until proven guilty. This is extremely inconvenient in the
inevitable situation of “He said/She said.”
People tend to believe what they want to believe. If
you believe that all Hollywood producers have casting couches in their offices,
then a wave of accusations vindicates your beliefs. But the fact that
evidence supports your pre-existing belief system does not make it more credible.
Creating a mentality where every woman’s accusation is accepted by a knee-jerk
reaction as fact does not get to the truth.
Remember the security guard at the Atlanta Olympics in 1996
who found a bomb, and was then accused of planting the bomb? There was
never any evidence against him, but people thought the narrative would make a
good movie-of-the-week and so tended to believe the story, even though it was
fictional. We are so accustomed to seeing fictional stories in movies and
on TV that we start to evaluate all stories not by their plausibility but by
whether the story is entertaining.
To take another example, remember the McMartin pre-school
case in the 1980’s, when people were convinced that there was a vast
underground conspiracy of Satan worshippers in America, and these cults were
systematically abducting very young children and subjecting them to horrific
rituals? People believed it even though it made no sense and there was no
evidence, just because it was an entertaining, if disturbing, story. The
folks that ran the McMartin pre-school who were accused of being the
ringleaders of these cults were exonerated, but only after a lengthy trial and
even then, many people probably dismissed the not guilty verdict as a product
of the Devil’s handiwork.
Thus far, the accusations of sexual harassment (and worse)
that have been made have at least had the appearance of credibility, and few
accusers have categorically denied the allegations. But at some point (it
may already have happened) someone is going to make a false accusation, and
when that time comes it is important that the accused be given every
o0pportunity to respond, including the presumption of innocence.
You can look at the tidal wave of disclosures about sexual
harassment as evidence of just how bad the problem has been in Hollywood and in
politics, but at some point, the insatiable maw that is the internet and the
news industry will demand more victims, and someone out there will be only too
happy to offer up some more examples of male oppression, even if they have to
fabricate them. When that happens, I hope that people can stop surfing
the wave of accusations and start to evaluate these claims with a critical eye
and a little bit of reason.
No comments:
Post a Comment