There is one argument that I hate more than any other, and
that is justifying some policy just because of “tradition.” The name of the football team in Washington
is obviously racist, yet the owner and thousands (millions?) of fans refuse to
change it because of tradition. Homophobes
hide behind religion to mask their bigotry, all the while saying they support “traditional”
families. The argument is basically that
just because were done a certain way yesterday, they should be done the same
way today despite all of the ways the world has changed since yesterday.
Baseball, the sport steeped in the greatest amount of
tradition, is the one most susceptible to accepting tradition as an excuse for
idiocy. For 150 years batters have been commanded to stoically trot around the
bases after a home run, lest they be found guilty of “showing up” the
pitcher. It used to be even worse—I remember
when a player would hit a home run, and then next batter would inevitably get
plunked. The pitcher had to punish the
next batter because the previous batter had somehow insulted the pitcher by doing
his job. Hey, pitcher, you don’t want to
be “shown up”? make better pitches.
I also recall the furor when a Mets rookie named Lastings
Milledge came up in 2006 at hit his first home run in his home ballpark, and he
high fived fans in the stands as he went to his position in right field. “That
young man will learn how to play the game right,” intoned the announcer, who
couldn’t have been more disgusted by this spontaneous outpouring of exuberance
if it had included photos of Roseanne Barr naked.
Things may be on the verge of changing. Reining AL MVP Josh Donaldson hit a home run
against the Minnesota Twins. Obviously
this was an insult to pitcher Phil Hughes, who greeted Donaldson with an
extremely inside pitch in his next at bat.
Hughes next pitch was behind Donaldson, but plate umpire Ripperger didn’t
even issue a warning to Hughes.
Donaldson’s manager John Gibbons came out f the dugout to complain and
was ejected for his efforts.
Maybe, you say, Hughes wasn’t deliberately throwing at
Donaldson. Maybe the two pitches just “got away” from Hughes. Right.
Hughes is a professional pitcher, someone who makes his living throwing
a baseball accurately, but after Donaldson hit a home run off of him he threw a
pitch four feet off the plate behind Donaldson?
I’ve heard of nibbling at the corners, but missing a target by four feet
is more than a little “off.”
Of course the Blue Jays aren’t innocent; later in the game
they hit Minnesota catcher Kurt Suzuki in the bottom of the inning. That’s always the way with these beanball
wars; you always HAVE to retaliate. The
logic is this: if I throw at you, you will be intimidated, but if you throw at
me, I’ll retaliate. It never occurs to
anyone that if they would retaliate if they were thrown at, then the other team
will retaliate when THEY are thrown at.
A baseball is a weapon. Using a weapon against another
person is wrong. If you want some idea
of what a baseball can do when thrown, look at what happened to
pitcher Ryan Vogelsong when he was hit by a pitch (not intentionally). Okay, pitchers want the inside part of the
plate, but Hughes apparently wanted the batter’s box to count as a strike zone.
If pitchers insist on enforcing “the code” and throwing at
players who run out a home run too slowly, or too quickly, or admire their homers
for too long, or not long enough, then they deserve to have the inside part f
the plate taken away from them by the umps.
Managers ordering retaliatory plunkings should be summarily
ejected.
I know there was one umpire who didn’t believe in enforcing
the rule to eject pitchers who “intentionally” threw at batters because, he
said, how could I possibly read the pitcher’s mind? The rule says “intentionally”
so it must assume it is possible to infer intent. Did the batter homer in the previous at
bat? Did the prior batter homer? Was one of the pitcher’s teammates hit by a
pitch after homering? It isn’t rocket
science. And if occasionally a pitcher
is ejected for a pitch that did get away from him, well, he should be a good
enough pitcher not to let that happen.
It is time to end the beanball culture in baseball. Maybe pitchers used to know how to throw at
batters, hitting them with a change up near the rump, but today’s pitchers do
seem to have less control; throwing behind a batter is extremely dangerous
(batters tend to instinctively back up when they see a pitch coming
inside). Knock off the macho posturing
and play ball.
No comments:
Post a Comment