Numbers don’t mean as much as they used to in sports. In baseball, 714 once was a hallowed number
every fan could recite; ask most fans now what the all-time home run record is
and many would still say 714. Either 500
home runs or 3,000 hits used to be a ticket to Cooperstown; Rafael Palmiero had
both and he was just eliminated from the Hall of Fame ballot because he got
less than 5% of the possible votes. The
debate over who is the greatest quarterback in NFL history comes down not to
numbers, but on how much post-season success should count.
But numbers still mean something, and we could be watching
an historic trek over the next few years.
Serena Williams has, as I write this, 17 Grand Slam championships. By the time you read this she may have tied
Chris Evert and Martina Natratilova, who have 18. Once she catches them, her sights will be set
on Helen Wills Moody (19), Steffi Graf (22) and Margaret Court (24). The question is, can Serena catch Margaret
Court and become the Greatest Of All Time?
Let’s concede one thing right away: if Margaret Court in her
prime were transported to 2014 to play a match with Serena, Serena would win
6-0, 6-0 in 30 minutes and all Margaret Court would have to show for it would
be a lot of wooden tennis rackets broken by Serena’s 120 MPH serves (Helen
Wills Moody would probably see one serve and run back to her time
machine). Serena does not need to win 24
Grand Slams to be considered the Greatest of All Time.
The argument against Serena getting to 24 championships
would be that unbeaten adversary, Father Time.
Serena is at an age when most women’s tennis players are retired, not
winning championships. Roger Federer is
about the same age and he is tinkering with his racket to try and gain an edge
in a probably futile attempt to add to his title record. Winning seven more championships would
probably take too long, given the time she has left.
The problem with the above analysis is that it is completely
wrong. Federer is fading, but Serena is
more dominant now than she was a decade ago.
How long it will take her to win seven more slams depends on how many
she can win per year, and right now it’s hard to see who can stop her. Serena is probably more dominant in her sport
than any individual athlete ever, except possibly for Tiger Woods at his peak.
Serena’s record against her four closest rivals (Azarenka,
Sharapova, Li and Radwanska) is 47-6, or Serena wins 88.7% of the time. The only woman in the top ten who has beaten
Serena four times is Jelena Jankovic, against whom Serena’s record is 8-4. Serena’s worst record against a currently active
player is her 14-10 record against her sister Venus, but given Venus’ health
problems it doesn’t look like the two of them will be meeting in any more Slam
finals.
Will surfaces factor in to how many Slams she can win per
year? It appears not. Serena has a career Grand Slam, and the only
thing stopping Serena from holding all four major titles at one time in 2013
was her loss to Sloane Stevens in the 2013 Aussie Open; before that she had won
the 2012 Wimbledon and US Opens, and then won the 2013 French Open. She is capable of winning all four majors in
a year, which would get her to 24 wins by 2015.
She should be the favorite on the grass at Wimbledon for several more
years. So all four surfaces are in play,
although the red clay of Roland Garros is the hardest surface for her to win on
(only two of her 17 titles).
Of course the big wild card is health. Serena has played in all four majors only six
times since 1999. But two of those years
were 2012 and 2013, and she won two slams in both of those years. At that pace (two per year) she could win six
more majors in three years and be only one shy of Court’s record of 24, and she
could easily pick up that additional title at some point. Given her head-to-head record against her
closest rivals, I’d take that action.
I think that even with minor health issues Serena could
continue to win at least two major titles per year for another three years, and
can easily pick up an additional slam to reach Margaret Court’s total of
24. I can’t see her playing much longer
than that before the inevitable decline kicks in, but if I were Serena Williams
I’d start building some more shelves for my trophy case.
No comments:
Post a Comment